Legal Opinion

Mason v. Bulleri

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 18, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2552PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HAIRE, Chief Judge, Division 1.

On this appeal from the trial court’s granting of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the parties agree that there were no issues of material fact, but disagree as to what facts were material.

The plaintiff real estate brokers (appellants), who sued the defendants to recover a real estate commission, contend that many facts considered by the trial judge constituted inadmissible, and therefore immaterial, parol evidence. On the other hand, the defendant real property owners (appellees) contend that such facts were admissible, not to vary or…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Haymes v. RogersArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Carter v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. R. A. Poff & Co. v. OttawaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. 7-G Ranching Company v. StitesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Beckwith v. Clevenger Realty Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clarke v. HartleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Coldwell Banker Commercial Group, Inc. v. Camelback Office ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. Goldberg Realty Group v. WeinsteinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  4. Musselman v. Southwinds Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Prall v. CorumDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API