Legal Opinion

Goldberg Realty Group v. Weinstein

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 3, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant David Weinstein appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (York County, Crowley, J.) awarding plaintiff Goldberg Realty Group (GRG) a commission pursuant to the terms of a real estate listing contract. Weinstein argues on appeal that the court erred in ruling that GRG’s failure to disclose certain facts relating to the sale did not constitute a breach of fiduciary duty. Because we conclude that GRG breached its duty by failing to disclose all facts material to the sale and therefore forfeited any entitlement to a commission, we vacate the judgment.

Th…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Batson v. StrehlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Owen v. SheltonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1981
  3. Veasey v. CarsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900
  4. Chadwick-BaRoss, Inc. v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  5. Salmon Lake Seed Co. v. Frontier Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MinnickIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Tyrone Wade v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Officemax, Inc. v. LevesqueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. OFFICEMAX INCORPORATED v. County Qwick Print, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2010
  5. Kearney v. J.P. King Auction Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API