Legal Opinion
Clarke v. Hartley
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 16, 1982No. 43648PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarkus, J.
The sellers brought this action against the buyers for breach of their real estate purchase contract, and against the real estate brokers for breach of their duty to assist the sellers. The trial court denied the motion by plaintiffs-sellers for summary judgment against defendants-buyers, and granted motions for summary judgment in favor of the defendants-buyers and the defendants-brokers. Plaintiffs-sellers appeal from the resulting dismissal of their action. Without reaching any conclusion about the ultimate resolution of this action, we agree with plaintiffs that defendants were not…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Brack v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Amstutz v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1940
- Luther Williams, Jr., Inc. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Dr. Gopal Potti, Kamala Potti, Vinayak Potti, a Minor, and Lakshmi Potti, a Minor, Cross-Appellants v. Duramed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Seringetti Construction Co. v. City of CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Books a Million, Inc. v. H & N ENTERPRISES, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Kaufman v. ByersOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
- Coldwell Banker Residential Real Estate Services, Inc. v. BishopOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.