Legal Opinion

Baker v. Ludlam

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1889No. 13,512PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

This was an action by Lillian G. Ludlam against Sanford Baker and Mary C. Baker to recover the possession of certain real estate in Clinton county.

After answering separately by a general denial, the defendant Mary C. Baker filed a cross-complaint in two paragraphs, in which, substantially, the following facts are exhibited: In *88July, 1882, the cross-complainant, being the owner of the land described in the complaint, executed a mortgage, in which her husband, Sanford Baker, joined, to secure a debt amounting to over $1,300 due from the latter to William E. Ross. The note and mortgage having…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. RootIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Searle v. WhippermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Dunkle v. ElstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. American Insurance v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Lane v. SchlemmerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Warner v. Young America Volunteer Fire DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Bement v. MayIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Clark v. HillisIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Rigler v. RiglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Gates v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1890

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API