Legal Opinion

Bement v. May

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1893No. 16,615PublishedCited by 23 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, J.

This was a suit brought in the court below by appellant against appellee, to review a judgment alleged to have been recovered theretofore in the same court by appellee against appellant.

A demurrer was sustained to the complaint to review, which ruling is the only error assigned here.

The errors assigned in the complaint to review are:

1. That the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

2. Error in overruling defendant’s demurrer to the complaint.

3. Error in overruling defendant’s motion for change of venue from the county.

3 K. Error in permitting plaintiff to…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Cincinnati, Hamilton & Indianapolis Railroad v. MaddenIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. McCartneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Shoemaker v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ketcham v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Scanlin v. StewartIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Jones v. MayneIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Young v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Jenkins v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API