In Re Petition of Metro Siding, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
Respondents Metro Siding, Inc.; North-land Cabinets, Inc.; and JLJ Partnership commenced a proceeding subsequent to initial registration of land, seeking an order declaring appellant Murr Plumbing, Inc.’s, mechanic’s lien statement invalid and directing issuance of a new certificate of title in respondents’ names only. Murr Plumbing filed an answer and counterpetition seeking an order declaring respondents’ mechanic’s lien statements invalid and directing issuance of a new certificate of title in Murr Plumbing’s name only. Following a trial on stipulated facts, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Brookfield Trade Center, Inc. v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Seim Ex Rel. Seim v. GaravaliaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Nolan v. StuebnerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
- City of Ramsey v. HolmbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Burns v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Wilhite v. Scott County Housing & Redevelopment AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Walther v. LundbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002