Legal Opinion

Nolan v. Stuebner

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 4, 1988No. C4-88-214PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

Respondents Charles Nolan and Nancy Nolan initiated a declaratory judgment action in 1984 against appellants James Stu-ebner and Diane Stuebner, asking the court to determine whether they have a pedestrian easement across the Stuebners’ property and an easement to erect and maintain a dock off the Stuebners’ Lake Minnetonka shoreline. The matter was tried before the trial court, which granted a declaratory judgment in favor of respondents on May 15,1987. The trial court denied appellants’ motion for amended findings or in the alternative a new trial, and judgment was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Metro Office Parks Co. v. Control Data Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. Nichols v. Shelard National BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. Theros v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Simms v. FaganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Kleis v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. EichmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State Ex Rel. Angela M.W. v. KruzickiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re CollierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Wagner v. Crossland Construction Company, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
  5. In Re Petition of Metro Siding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API