Legal Opinion
City of Ramsey v. Holmberg
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 28, 1996No. C5-95-2346PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
Larry Holmberg and the Amusement Center, Inc.1 appeal from summary judgment *304granted to respondent City of Ramsey (the city), arguing that a zoning ordinance is over-broad and vague. We affirm.
FACTS
Larry Holmberg (Holmberg) owned and operated a business in the city called the Amusement Center, Inc. When it opened in 1990, it sold adult books, magazines, and novelties; it also operated booths for viewing adult movies. At the time the Amusement Center opened, the city had no ordinances governing the location of adult businesses, and there were no other adult businesses…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. BotsfordCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- 301 Clifton Place L.L.C. v. 301 Clifton Place Condominium Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- Meriwether Minnesota Land & Timber, LLC v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.