Legal Opinion
Cherry Valley Pass Acres & Neighbors v. City of Beaumont
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 22, 2010No. E049651PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
I. INTRODUCTION
Defendant City of Beaumont (the City) approved a specific plan, the Sunny-Cal Specific Plan (the SCSP or project), to build 560 residential units on a 200-acre site long used for agricultural purposes and located in an unincorporated area north of the City known as Cherry Valley. In August 2007, the City certified an environmental impact report (EIR) and adopted a statement of overriding considerations for the SCSP pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.),1 and took related actions approving the SCSP.…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Western States Petroleum Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Neighbors for Smart Rail v. Exposition Metro Line Construction AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Rialto Citizens for Responsible Growth v. City of RialtoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Town of Atherton v. California High-Speed Rail AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- South County Citizens for Smart Growth v. County of NevadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Masonite Corp. v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.