Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

South County Citizens for Smart Growth v. County of Nevada

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 2013No. C067764UnpublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MAURO, J.

Petitioner South County Citizens for Smart Growth (Smart Growth) appeals from the trial court’s denial of its petition for writ of mandate in which Smart Growth alleged that the County of Nevada (the County) violated various provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) in approving a commercial real estate project in Nevada County. Smart Growth contends we must reverse the judgment because (1) the County failed to prepare and recirculate a revised draft environmental impact report (EIR) adding an alternative project…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Badie v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Nwosu v. UbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  5. Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
  3. Central Delta Water Agency v. Dept. of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Central Delta Water Agency v. Dept. of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. Citizens for Positive Growth & Preservation v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API