Legal Opinion

Masonite Corp. v. County of Mendocino

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 2013No. A134896PublishedCited by 11 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SIGGINS, J.

Masonite Corporation (Masonite) appeals from a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate to set aside approvals by Mendocino County (County) of the Kunzler Terrace Mine Project (Project) to be developed by Granite Construction Company (Granite; Granite and the County are hereafter referred to collectively as respondents), and the final environmental impact report (EIR) for its Project, for failure to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.).

Masonite argues the approval process and the EIR were deficient in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  2. California Native Plant Society v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. Defend the Bay v. City of IrvineCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Endangered Habitats League, Inc. v. County of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Preserve Wild Santee v. City of SanteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Friends of the Kings River v. County of FresnoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. Citizens Opposing A Dangerous Environ. v. Co. of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. King and Gardiner Farms, LLC v. County of KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Living Rivers Council v. State Water Res. Control Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API