Legal Opinion
American Surety Co. v. Heise
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 1, 1955No. Civ. 5064PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff and appellant surety company instituted this action against defendants and respondents E. C. Heise, his minor son Edgar Loren Heise, and others, seeking to have it declared that an automobile liability policy issued on January 15, 1952, covering a 1946 Mercury, in which E. C. Heise, the father, was named as the sole owner, was void from its inception because, contrary to the declaration in the policy, he was not such sole owner. The claim is that it was defendant E. C. Heise’s minor son who furnished the money, was the owner and only user of the automobile, and that it was…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New York v. Hilton-GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Telford v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Maxson v. LlewelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Rukhsana Chaudhry v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Harr v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1969
- Bill Brown Construction Co. v. Glens Falls Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1991
- Osborne v. Security InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Gillis v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1965
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.