Elam v. Elam
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Ness, Justice:
These consolidated appeals present an identical issue: Is § 15-5-210, Code of Laws of South Carolina (1976), which abolishes the parental immunity doctrine only in motor vehicle accident cases, unconstitutional? We conclude it is.
Both cases involve unemancipated minor passengers who were injured while riding in automobiles allegedly operated negligently by a parent. The trial court held the statute violated the equal protection clauses of the South Carolina and United States Constitutions pursuant to this Court’s decision in Marley v. Kirby, 271 S. C. 122, 245 S. E. (2d) 604…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hewlett v. GeorgeMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
- Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Gibson v. GibsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Falco v. PADOSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Rupert Ex Rel. Rupert v. StienneNevada Supreme Court · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Foldi v. JeffriesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Winn v. GilroyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Turner v. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Unah by and Through Unah v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.