Legal Opinion

Lovallo v. Froehlke

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided June 20, 1972No. Civ. No. 1972-26PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CURTIN, District Judge.

Both sides have moved for summary judgment, the respondents formally by filing a motion and the petitioner informally during the course of oral argument. The court has considered the affidavits and exhibits and has determined that there is no dispute about the facts in the case.

On December 10, 1968, Lee Lovallo enlisted in the Regular Army for a term of three years, with an initial assignment option for the 26th Army Band at Fort Wadsworth, New York. At the time of his enlistment, he executed an “Acknowledgement of Service Obligation under Military Selective Service Act…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Schlanger v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  4. Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Eagles v. United States Ex Rel. SamuelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1946

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lee T. Lovallo v. Robert F. Froehlke, Secretary of the Army and Major General John Hightower, Commanding General of Fort Hamilton ComplexCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  2. Proffitt v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
  3. United States v. Lieutenant Colonel DAVID P. BARTLETT, JR.Army Court of Criminal Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API