Legal Opinion
Albert H. Carter v. Robert Seamans, Jr., as Secretary of the Air Force
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 8, 1969No. 27359_1PublishedCited by 208 opinions
1Per curiam
Pursuant to new Rule 18 of the Rules of this court, we have concluded on the merits that this case is of such character as not to justify oral argument and have directed the clerk to place the case on the Summary Calendar and to notify the parties in writing. See Murphy v. Houma Well Service, 5 Cir. 1969, 409 F.2d 804, Part I.
This appeal is taken from the judgment of the court below dismissing the appellant’s action without prejudice. We affirm.
Appellant was discharged from the United States Air Force under conditions other than honorable. In his complaint he asks for a declaratory judgment…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Larson v. Domestic and Foreign Commerce Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Dugan v. RankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Vitarelli v. SeatonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- RANDALL D. WOLCOTT, MD, PA v. SebeliusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Pamela Lea Maier v. Verne Orr, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Arthur Edward Sheehan v. Army and Air Force Exchange Service, an Instrumentality of the Departments of the Army and of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Hahn, Michael S. And Bradley, B. Shay and All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Stephanie CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. General Robert E. CUSHMAN, Jr., Commandant, United States Marine Corps, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.