Operton v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtReilly, J.
¶ 1. In 2013, our legislature enacted an entirely new statutory ground for the denial of unemployment benefits: "substantial fault." We are presented in this case with an issue of first impression as to the statutory construction and application of "substantial fault" as that term is defined in Wis. Stat. § 108.04(5g)(a) (2013-14).1 We set aside the decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) as it erred in its construction and application of "substantial fault" to the facts presented.
Statement of Facts
¶ 2. Lela Operton worked as a full-time service clerk for Walgreens from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boynton Cab Co. v. NeubeckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Transamerica Insurance v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Consolidated Const. Co., Inc. v. CaseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Applied Plastics, Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Operton v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Baires v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2017
- Easterling v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2017
- Kielmar v. Erie Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.