Legal Opinion

Easterling v. Labor & Industry Review Commission

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 2, 2017No. 2016AP190PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSherman, J.

¶ 1. Paulina S. Easterling appeals a circuit court order that affirmed the decision of the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC) denying Easterling's claim for unemployment benefits on the basis of substantial fault. As pertinent to our resolution of this appeal, LIRC based its decision on a finding that the conduct of Easterling that resulted in her termination was intentional, and not an "inadvertent error[]," as that phrase is used in Wis. Stat. § 108.04(5g) (2015-16).1 For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the order of the circuit court and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGR…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sweet v. BergeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  2. Hilton Ex Rel. Pages Homeowners' Ass'n v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. DeBoer Transportation, Inc. v. SwensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Operton v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Operton v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Capable Canines of Wis. v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
  3. Operton v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API