Operton v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
PATIENCE DRAKE ROGGENSACK, C.J.
This is a review of a published decision of the court of appeals1 reversing a circuit court order that affirmed a determination by the Labor and Industry Review Commission (LIRC).2 LIRC determined that Lela Operton (Operton) was ineligible for unemployment benefits because she was terminated for substantial fault.
¶ 2. We conclude that LIRC incorrectly denied Operton unemployment benefits. Operton was entitled to unemployment benefits because her actions do not fit within the definition of substantial fault as set forth in Wis. Stat. § 108.04(5g)(a)…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Seider v. O'CONNELLWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Kristi Koschkee v. Tony EversWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. Anthony R. PicoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Clean Wisconsin, Inc. v. DNRWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
- Catholic Charities Bureau, Inc. v. State of Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.