Legal Opinion

Cancilla v. Gehlhar

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 23, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is a suit in which plaintiff questions the validity of chapter 382, Oregon Laws, 1933, commonly known as the “Produce Dealers and Peddlers Act”.

Plaintiff contends that the act is invalid for the reasons: (1) That it was never legally enacted; (2) that it violates section 20, Article I, of the Constitution of Oregon; (3) that it violates the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

The circuit court upheld the validity of the act and plaintiffs appeal.

1. It would be no value to the profession or to the public to give a lengthy analysis and explanation of the history…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Clark v. RossierIdaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Rosenbloom v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State v. BriggsOregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Anderson v. ThomasOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Ex parte CaseOregon Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API