Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Foster v. Naftalin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 20, 1956No. 36,749Published
1Opinion of the Court
246 Minn. 181 (1956)
STATE EX REL. CHARLES FOSTER
v.
ARTHUR NAFTALIN AND OTHERS.[1]
No. 36,749.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
January 20, 1956.
Miles Lord, Attorney General, Lowell J. Grady, Deputy Attorney General, and Joseph J. Bright, Assistant Attorney General, for appellants.
Harry H. Peterson and Leonard Frank, for respondent.
KNUTSON, JUSTICE.
This proceeding originally was commenced as an action for a declaratory judgment seeking a determination of the constitutionality of L. 1955, c. 857, and an injunction restraining defendants from acting thereunder. While a motion for a temporary injunction…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Lochner v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Smith v. AllwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Union Pacific Railroad v. Mason City & Fort Dodge RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- State Ex Rel. Foster v. NaftalinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.