Legal Opinion
Rosenbloom v. State
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided April 2, 1902No. 12,451PublishedCited by 40 opinions
Error from the district court for Platte county. Tried below before Grimison, J. Holcomb, J., dissenting.
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, C. J.
Max Rosenbloom, defendant below, having been convicted of peddling in Platte county without a license, seeks by this proceeding to obtain a reversal of the sentence. The statutory provisions which we have occasion to consider in disposing of the questions presented for decision are found in the general revenue law (Compthed Statutes, 1901, art. 1, ch. 77), and are here set out:
“Sec. 152. Peddlers plying their vocation outside of the limits of a city or town within any county in this state and peddlers selling by sample outside of the limits of a city or town within any county in this state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. SternbergSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Denver City Railway Co. v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
- State ex rel. Luria v. WagenerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1899
- In re DasslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
- In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Salt Lake City v. Christensen Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1908
- Steinacher v. SwansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Moeller, McPherrin & Judd v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.