State Ex Rel. Foster v. Naftalin

I agree that there exists a variance which might be considered material in L. 1955, c. 857, art. 9, § 1, as signed by the Governor from that passed by the legislature and would not quarrel with a decision holding that part of the act unconstitutional. I cannot agree that the *212remaining parts, which are independent and self-sustaining, are invalid so as to render the entire act unconstitutional.

The so-called Reorganization Act of 1955 is a comprehensive pattern of légal enactments designed for the purpose of achieving economy and efficiency in the administration of the important departments of…