Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Tomasic v. Unified Gov't of Wyandotte County/Kansas City

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 10, 1998No. 81,074PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Abbott, J.:

This is an original proceeding in quo warranto. The action was filed by Wyandotte County District Attorney Nick Tomasic, seeking rulings concerning the proposed construction of an auto race track facility and related projects in Wyandotte County. Respondent is the Unified Government of Wyandotte County/ Kansas City, Kansas.

In general, relator seeks (1) a determination that some of the amendments to the urban redevelopment statutes, K.S.A. 12-1770 et seq., (also sometimes referred to as the tax increment financing statutes) contained in L.…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Mitchell v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Manzanares v. BellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  5. State Ex Rel. Schneider v. LiggettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Landmark National Bank v. KeslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Oklahoma City Urban Renewal Authority v. Medical Technology & Research AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  3. In Re Tax Application of Lietz Constr. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  4. St. Louis County v. River Bend Estates Homeowners' Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  5. Barrett Ex Rel. Barrett v. Unified School District No. 259Supreme Court of Kansas · 2001

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API