In Re Tax Application of Lietz Constr. Co.
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Abbott, J.:
Appellant Wabaunsee County challenges the decision of the Kansas Board of Tax Appeals (BOTA) granting Merle and Nora Lietz, d/b/a Lietz Construction Company (Lietz Construction), exemptions from ad valorem property tax on machinery and equipment pursuant to K.S.A. 2001 Supp. 79-201j(a). At issue is whether Lietz Construction’s bulldozers, dirt scrapers, a road grader, an excavator, and the trailers that carry them qualify as “farm machinery and equipment . . . actually and regularly used in any farming or ranching operation,” within the…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Havens Realty Corp. v. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Coates v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Kansas State Board of Healing Arts v. FooteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Board of Lincoln County Comm'rs v. NielanderSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Unified School District No. 233 v. Kansas Ass'n of American EducatorsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- State v. PrineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- State v. MartisSupreme Court of Kansas · 2004
- Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.