Legal Opinion

Landmark National Bank v. Kesler

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided August 28, 2009No. 98,489PublishedCited by 62 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Rosen, J.:

Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.

(MERS) and Sovereign Bank seek review of an opinion by our Court of Appeals holding that a nonlender is not a contingently necessary party in a mortgage foreclosure action and that due process does not require that a nonlender be allowed to intervene in a mortgage foreclosure action.

The facts underlying this appeal are not in dispute. On March 19, 2004, Boyd Kesler secured a loan of $50,000 from Landmark National Bank (Landmark) with a mortgage registered in Ford County, Kansas. On March 15,2005,…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  3. Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Citimortgage, Inc. v. Shannon S. Barabas a/k/a Shannon Sheets Barabas, ReCasa Financial Group, LLC, and Rick A. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API