Landmark National Bank v. Kesler
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Rosen, J.:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
(MERS) and Sovereign Bank seek review of an opinion by our Court of Appeals holding that a nonlender is not a contingently necessary party in a mortgage foreclosure action and that due process does not require that a nonlender be allowed to intervene in a mortgage foreclosure action.
The facts underlying this appeal are not in dispute. On March 19, 2004, Boyd Kesler secured a loan of $50,000 from Landmark National Bank (Landmark) with a mortgage registered in Ford County, Kansas. On March 15,2005,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Town of Castle Rock v. GonzalesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in ActionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Carpenter v. LonganSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Eaton v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Gomes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Bain v. Metropolitan Mortgage Group, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Shannon S. Barabas a/k/a Shannon Sheets Barabas, ReCasa Financial Group, LLC, and Rick A. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.