Legal Opinion

Waggoner v. Koon

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 9, 1917No. 6571PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from County Court, Beckham County; E. H. Gipson, Judge. Replevin by W. D. Waggoner and another against Rias Koon. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This was an action in replev-in, commenced by the plaintiffs in error, plaintiffs below, against the defendant in error, defendant below. Hereafter the parties will be designated “plaintiffs” and “defendants,” respectively, as they appeared in the trial court. Upon trial to a jury there was a verdict in favor of (lip defendant for the return of the property, or its value, and for damages for wrongful taking and detention, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced.

The plaintiffs set up a special ownership in the property involved, to wit, two…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ray v. NavarreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Harrison National Bank v. LeslieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  3. Long v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helfinstine v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  2. Morgan v. Stanton Auto Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Firebaugh v. GuntherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Westerman v. Oregon Automobile Credit Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Ben Cooper Motor Co. v. AmeySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API