Legal Opinion
Ray v. Navarre
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 16, 1915No. 6724PublishedCited by 21 opinions
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; W. R. Taylor, Judge. Replevin by Louis Navarre and others against Thomas H. Ray and another, doing business as Ray & Lanyon. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
This was an action in replevin, commenced by the defendants in error, plaintiffs below, against the plaintiffs in error, defendants below. The fifth amended petition upon which the cause was tried alleged, in effect, that the defendants unlawfully, oppressively, and by force and threats took and carried away certain personal property belonging to the plaintiffs; the prayer thereof being:
“That the plaintiffs have judgment against the defendants for the return of the property involved or the value of the same and actual damages in the sum of $2,475 for the unlawful detention thereof, and $1,000…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Murphey v. VirginNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- McClellan v. GastonWashington Supreme Court · 1898
- Arzaga v. VillalbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- M'Donald v. ScaifeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Wiley v. McGrathSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Ivy v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Sopkin v. Premier Pontiac, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Myers v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Davidson v. First Bank & Trust Co., YaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.