Legal Opinion

Westerman v. Oregon Automobile Credit Corp.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1942PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBband, J.

This is an action, as asserted by the plaintiff, “for trespass to a motor vehicle and its contents.” From a judgment of involuntary nonsuit plaintiff has prosecuted this appeal. The complaint alleges in substance that on the 13th day of January, 1940, the plaintiff, being the owner of a Ford car, borrowed money from the defendant, Oregon Automobile Credit Corporation (hereafter called the company), and to secure the loan executed a chattel mortgage upon the car. The complaint alleges further:

“That on or about the 9th day of March, 1940, while the plaintiff was enjoying the use, ownership and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Singer Sewing Machine Co. v. RiosTexas Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Wilson Motor Co. v. DunnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Commercial Credit Co. v. SpenceMississippi Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Lyda v. CooperSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1933
  5. Texas Auto Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sheila Hensley v. Ronald GassmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Jack Harris, II v. City of Roseburg, Municipal Corporation, John Miller and Les BergmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. Cook v. KINZUA PINE MILLS CO.Oregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Lukas v. J. C. Penney Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Stone MacHinery Co. v. KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API