King v. Ditto
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of an alleged improper use of an X-ray machine. Plaintiff employed the defendants, who are duly licensed physicians and surgeons, to remove a needle which had become imbedded in her right hand.
Plaintiff alleged, and there was evidence tending to show, that the defendants were negligent in exposing her hand to X-rays in such manner as to result in a serious and permanent injury. Plaintiff testified, in substance, that, in accordance with the direction of the defendants, she held her hand in front of the X-ray…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Hunter v. BurroughsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1918
- Timmins v. HaleOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Ballance v. DunningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
- Lewis v. CasenburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- Matter of Application of La DueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Purtill v. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
- Getchell v. MansfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1971
- Rogers v. Meridian Park HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Strandholm v. General Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.