Legal Opinion

Guy v. Brennan

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 17, 1923No. Civ. No. 3876PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Plaintiff, a realty broker, brought this action to recover the commission earned by him in the sale of defendants’ apartment house. Judgment passed for plaintiff and defendants appeal.

The first point advanced by appellants against the judgment is more technical than meritorious. The complaint alleged and the trial court found that defendants employed plaintiff to find a purchaser for the “furniture, furnishings and equipment” of the apartment house. Defendants, who had leased the house from the owner, held a five-year lease thereon. Plaintiff, as the proof showed, was employed to find a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Summerville v. Stockton Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Jeffers v. Easton, Eldridge & Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Bourn v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Townsend v. BoydSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  5. Garber v. GianellaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Callahan v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Gerhard v. StephensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Dabney v. EdwardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Howard v. County of AmadorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Intermountain Realty Co. v. AllenIdaho Supreme Court · 1939

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API