Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Heim

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 23, 1987No. C 84-8069 TEHPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CONCERNING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND FOR SANCTIONS

THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action are six individuals who invested in four limited partnerships ostensibly organized to produce oil and gas through the use of new “enhanced oil recovery technology” (“EOR”). These named plaintiffs are attempting to proceed as class representatives for over 1000 persons who invested in these four partnerships and in 36 other similar partnerships offered between 1979 and 1983. In their Fourth Amended Complaint, plaintiffs advance…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Wash. Mut. Bank v. Superior Court of Orange Cty.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Walco Investments, Inc. v. ThenenDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1996
  3. Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
  4. Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1990
  5. In re Blech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API