Legal Opinion
In re Blech Securities Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 11, 1999No. 94 Civ. 7696(RWS)PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The plaintiffs in these consolidated actions alleging securities and common law fraud have moved for certification of a class pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)3, Fed.R.Civ.P. The motion has been opposed by defendants Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. (“Bear Stearns”) and Baird Patrick & Co. (“Baird Patrick”). The motion is granted, and classes will be certified in accordance with the conclusions set forth below.
The Parties
Each of the seventeen named plaintiffs in these actions (the “Plaintiffs”) purchased securities of certain of twenty-two biotechnology companies in…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Eisenberg v. GagnonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- In re Global Crossing Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In re Vivendi Universal, S.A. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Lapin v. Goldman Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Telik, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.