Legal Opinion
Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 30, 1990No. C-89-20184-RFPPublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND
PECKHAM, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court upon defendants’ motion to dismiss the above entitled action. The Court has fully considered the submissions and arguments of the parties. GOOD CAUSE appearing therefor, the defendants’ motion to dismiss is GRANTED for the reasons set forth herein. Plaintiff is GRANTED 30-days leave to amend her complaint. The stay of discovery, which was granted on August 11, 1989 pursuant to defendants’ motion and continued on September 15, 1989, will be lifted in accordance with…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Semegen v. WeidnerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,697 John P. Decker v. Massey-Ferguson, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- In Re Apple Computer Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- D. Neubronner v. Michael R. MilkenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Allied Capital Corp. v. GC-Sun Holdings, L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2006
- Wasco Products, Inc. v. Southwall Technologies, Inc. Bostik, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Colaprico v. Sun Microsystems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1991
- In Re Silicon Graphics, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.