Legal Opinion
Alfus v. Pyramid Technology Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 11, 1991No. C-89-20184 RFPPublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
PECKHAM, District Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ second motion to dismiss the first amended complaint, and individual defendant Rollnick’s motion to dismiss and to strike portions of the first amended complaint in the above-captioned matter. Plaintiff having remedied deficiencies in the original complaint, defendants’ second motion to dismiss is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part for the reasons set forth herein.
INTRODUCTION
This is a securities fraud class action brought against Pyramid Technology Corp. (“Pyramid”), several of its officers and one of its outside…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- In Re Time Warner Inc. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Albert Oran Terry Adolphs Philip Morris James Doyle Lupo Paul H. Maurer, Individually and on Behalf of a Class of Others Similarly Situated v. John R. Stafford Robert G. Blount Joseph J. Carr Louis L. Hoynes, Jr. William J. Murray David M. Olivier John R. Considine Paul J. Jones Fred Hassan American Home Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Gross v. Summa Four, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Marksman Partners, L.P. v. Chantal Pharmaceutical Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 1996
- Oran v. StaffordCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.