Legal Opinion
Jones v. Gayhart, 21838 (7-13-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 2007No. 21838PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
{¶ 1) Defendants, Coy and Terri Gayhart ("the Gayharts"), appeal from the trial court's denial of their Civ. R. 60(B) motion to vacate a summary judgment for Plaintiff, Granville Jones.
{¶ 2} On September 30, 2004, Jones commenced an action in foreclosure against the Gayharts concerning real property in Germantown. Jones alleged that the Gayharts had defaulted on a promissory note in the amount of $50,000 secured by a mortgage on the property. Jones filed an amended complaint on March 23, 2005, seeking judgment and ejection of the Gayharts from the Germantown property. The Gayharts…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
- Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Adomeit v. BaltimoreOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- Colley v. BazellOhio Supreme Court · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Cincinnati Insurance Co. v. Schaub, 22419 (9-19-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Benesch v. Action Software, Inc., 91708 (4-2-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- First Financial Servs. v. Cross Tabernacle, 06ap-404 (8-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Land, 2-07-20 (12-26-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Jp Morgan Chase Bank v. Brown, 21853 (1-11-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.