Legal Opinion

Colley v. Bazell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1980No. Nos. 80-425 and 80-427PublishedCited by 185 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDowd, J.

Initially, we consider and reject the claim advanced by the plaintiffs that the appeal of Bazell from the denial of his application for Civ. R. 60 relief should have been dismissed by the Court of Appeals because the notice of appeal was filed on May 9, 1978, more than 30 days following the granting of the default judgment on February 13, 1978. The plaintiffs correctly observe that the time for filing a notice of appeal from a judgment is not tolled by either the filing of a Civ. R. 60(B) motion for relief from judgment or a motion to reconsider. Kauder v. Kauder (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 265;…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1951
  3. Hinz v. Northland Milk & Ice Cream Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Doddridge v. FitzpatrickOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Greenspahn v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by185 opinions

  1. Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Griffey v. RajanOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Kay v. Marc Glassman, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Doe v. Trumbull County Children Services BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Marion Production Credit Ass'n v. CochranOhio Supreme Court · 1988

180 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API