Legal Opinion

Department of Public Safety v. Weinrich

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1978No. 12056PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZASTROW, Justice.

This is another case involving South Dakota’s Implied Consent Law. A hearing examiner for the Department of Public Safety ordered the revocation of defendant’s license to drive because of defendant’s refusal to take a blood test upon request. A circuit court judge affirmed the hearing examiner’s decision to revoke the license for one year, concluding that there was substantial evidence to support the hearing examiner’s decision. We affirm the circuit court’s decision.

The facts are essentially undisputed in this case. Laronne Arlen Weinrich was stopped for making an illegal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Blow v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Peterson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Beare v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Chmelka v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State, Department of Public Safety v. CroninSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rans v. State, Department of Commerce & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Kinkaid v. Board of Review of the City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Valandra v. State, Department of Commerce & RegulationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. In re the Revocation of the Driver License of PetreeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. FischerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API