Legal Opinion

Valandra v. State, Department of Commerce & Regulation

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1988No. 15906PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Justice.

In this decision we hold that under SDCL 32-23-11.1, in order to avoid revocation of driving privileges for refusal of a chemical test after an arrest for driving while under the influence of alcohol or drugs (DUI), not only must the driver plead guilty to the offense, but the court must accept such plea.

FACTS

Robert G. Valandra (referred to as Va-landra or appellant) and Wayne C. Miller (referred to as Miller or appellant) were each arrested and charged with DUI on different dates in 1986. Subsequent to their arrest, appellants were each read the standard implied consent…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Simpson v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. In Re the Appeal of the Sales Tax Refund Applications of Black Hills Power & Light Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Peterson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  4. State v. BunnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Beare v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Tripp County v. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Tripp County v. Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API