Legal Opinion

In re the Revocation of the Driver License of Petree

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1994No. 18498PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

South Dakota law provides that all drivers are deemed to consent to a blood/aleohol test requested by a law enforcement officer (SDCL 32-23-10) and penalizes those who refuse the test with the revocation of their driver’s license (SDCL 32-23-11). A driver refusing the blood test can avoid revocation by pleading guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI) before a revocation order is issued (SDCL 32-23-11.1). A driver whose license is revoked for refusing the blood test may also petition for an administrative hearing on the revocation (SDCL 32-23-11) or may appeal the revocation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. At & T Information Systems v. South Dakota State Board of EqualizationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Sioux Valley Hospital Ass'n v. BryanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In Re Certification of Question of LawSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. OhlmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Department of Public Safety v. WeinrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jansen v. Lemmon Federal Credit UnionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Diesel MacHinery, Inc. v. Manitowoc Crane GroupDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API