State, Department of Public Safety v. Cronin
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MORGAN, Justice.
In each case the defendant was involved with the Sioux Falls Police Department on a charge of DWI. For whatever reason, each refused to submit to the chemical blood analysis after the arresting officer had read him his rights from a standard form card, the contents of which substantially comply with the warning requirements of SDCL 32-23-11. Upon subsequent notification of intent to revoke, each petitioned for hearing before a department hearing officer. The officer’s decision in both cases was adverse as evidenced by his entry of orders of revocation.
At this point in the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Holland v. ParkerDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1973
- Security State Bank v. BreenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
- Hauck v. BullSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
- Jacobi v. ClarksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re the Appeal of the Sales Tax Refund Applications of Black Hills Power & Light Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Peterson v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
- Karlen v. JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State, Department of Public Safety v. EastmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- Department of Public Safety v. WeinrichSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.