Legal Opinion

Strong v. Twin Falls Canal Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1927No. 4480PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant is a Carey Act operating company, and plaintiff is the owner of certain lands irrigable from the canal system operated by defendant. The findings not attacked by appellant show that plaintiff has, ever since June 27, 1917, been the owner of the lands described in the complaint, having acquired same on said date by warranty deed from the then owner, Fanny L. Thomas; that on January 2, 1903, the state of Idaho, acting through its board of land commissioners, entered into a contract with the Twin Falls Land Water Company, a Carey Act construction company, under which it was agreed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hard v. Boise City Irrigation & Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Bennett v. Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Sarret v. HunterIdaho Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Village of Hailey v. RileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joyce Livestock Co. v. United StatesIdaho Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Leland v. Twin Falls Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Milner Low Lift Irrigation District v. EagenIdaho Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API