Leland v. Twin Falls Canal Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcNAUGHTON, J.
—This is an action in mandamus wherein the plaintiff, now respondent, sought and procured a writ of mandate against the Twin Falls Canal Company and its officers, commanding them to issue to respondent a water certificate for forty shares of the stock of the company, as appurtenant to the NE.¼ of the NE.¼ of Sec. 26, Twp. 9 South, R. 14 East, Twin Falls county, and formerly represented by certificate No. 5604.
From the record here it appears that in a previous case wherein Luigi Mendini and wife were plaintiffs, and Twin Falls Canal Company, Salina. S. Milner, J. J. Rugg, and unknown owners…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
- Bennett v. Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
- Douglas v. KenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
- Ireton v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
- Adams v. Twin Falls-Oakley Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- Kerley v. WetherellIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
- In Re RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
- Aumock v. Bank of Spirit LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
- Eagle Creek Irrigation Co. v. A.C. & C.E. Invs., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.