Legal Opinion

Leland v. Twin Falls Canal Co.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 19, 1931No. 5572PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcNAUGHTON, J.

—This is an action in mandamus wherein the plaintiff, now respondent, sought and procured a writ of mandate against the Twin Falls Canal Company and its officers, commanding them to issue to respondent a water certificate for forty shares of the stock of the company, as appurtenant to the NE.¼ of the NE.¼ of Sec. 26, Twp. 9 South, R. 14 East, Twin Falls county, and formerly represented by certificate No. 5604.

From the record here it appears that in a previous case wherein Luigi Mendini and wife were plaintiffs, and Twin Falls Canal Company, Salina. S. Milner, J. J. Rugg, and unknown owners…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bennett v. Twin Falls North Side Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Douglas v. KenneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Ireton v. Idaho Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Adams v. Twin Falls-Oakley Land & Water Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1916

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Andrews v. North Side Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Kerley v. WetherellIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  3. In Re RobinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Aumock v. Bank of Spirit LakeIdaho Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Eagle Creek Irrigation Co. v. A.C. & C.E. Invs., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API