Legal Opinion

Milner Low Lift Irrigation District v. Eagen

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1930No. 5387Published

1Opinion of the Court

GIVENS, O. J.

Defendant-respondent occupies land Avithin the geographical limits of appellant irrigation district which land he is purchasing under contract from the state of Idaho. Title being in the state, appellant concedes and asserts that no assessment as such may be levied upon the land by the appellant district for water furnished to it. (C. S., sec. 4402.)

The district sued to recover in a personal action for waste water used by the respondent in the year 1928 and appeals from an adverse judgment of dismissal on demurrer.

The gist of appellant’s contention is found in paragraph V of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Comstock v. RamsaySupreme Court of Colorado · 1913
  2. Davis v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Colburn v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  4. United States v. HagaDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1921
  5. Burkart v. MeibergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API