Legal Opinion
Joyce Livestock Co. v. United States
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 2007No. 32278, 32279, 32846PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EISMANN, Justice.
This is an appeal from a judgment upholding Joyce Livestock Company’s claim to in-stream water rights on federal rangeland for watering livestock, determining the priority dates of those water rights, and rejecting the claim of the United States that it also has instream water rights based upon appropriations by those it permitted to use the range-land after enactment of the Taylor Grazing Act in 1934. The district court also denied Joyce Livestock Company’s request for an award of attorney fees. We affirm the district court’s holding that Joyce Livestock Company has instream…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kennecott Copper Corp. v. State Tax CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ickes v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Clear Springs Foods, Inc. v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Bagley v. ThomasonIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Hydro Resources Corp. v. GrayNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
- Houston v. WhittierIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
- Bruce Byron Bedke and Jared K. Bedke v. City of OakleyIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.