Legal Opinion

In Re Robinson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1940No. 6779PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Petitioner owns 160 acres, together with 143.9 shares of the capital stock of the North Side Canal Company, a Carey Act operating company; each share representing %ths of a miner’s inch of water or a total of 89.9 inches. However, because the water is measured at the head of the canal system and only 61 per cent of the canal’s capacity is delivered, petitioner actually has only 54.83 inches of water, which he has applied beneficially on approximately 130 of his 160-acre tract. The available quantity of the Canal Company’s natural flow water rights in Snake River, because of later priority…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Hard v. Boise City Irrigation & Land Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Reno v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Sanderson v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Moe v. HargerIdaho Supreme Court · 1904

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Application of BoyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Beecher v. Cassia Creek Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Pfleuger v. HoppleIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Colthrop v. Mountain Home Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Rayl v. Salmon River Canal Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API