Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Lusher

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 7, 1936PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

The fundamental question underlying the present application is one of the jurisdiction of this court.

The main proceeding is for a discovery of property of the decedent pursuant to the provisions of section 205 of the Surrogate’s Court Act. The answer denied possession of any property of the estate in an individual capacity and asserted that an agreement was entered into on February 23,1935, between the respondent and the decedent, whereby the parties stated an account of the transactions of the respondent in respect to the possessions of the decedent, and agreed that certain…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Matter of WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. In Re the Estate of HeinzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  3. In re the Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of EhlertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933
  5. In Re the Accounting of EhlertNew York Court of Appeals · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. In re GoodchildNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
  3. In re the Estate of HallNew York Surrogate's Court · 1967
  4. In re the Estate of SichelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Estate of KadarNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API