Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Kadar
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 23, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William T. Collins, S.
The petitioner instituted a proceeding to discover property allegedly withheld by respondent Dreyfus & Company and others. Without filing answer, the respondents appeared for examination. Thereafter, by amended petition, the ancillary administrator sought an order to compel Dreyfus & Company to deliver certain assets to him. That petition was dismissed, with leave to file a new petition (3 Misc 2d 474). Thereupon a second amended petition was filed, praying for an order compelling Dreyfus & Company to turn over to petitioner property allegedly wrongfully withheld, or the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Keys v. LeopoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Le Marchant v. . MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Taussig v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Estate of KiamieNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Matthysse v. Securities Processing Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Union Bank of Switzerland v. HS Equities, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- In re the Estate of ChildNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
- In re the Estate of KadarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957