In re the Chemical Bank & Trust Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMcAvoy, J.
This discovery proceeding was begun by an order dated February 27, 1930, requiring Kathryn T. Hicks, a daughter of the deceased, Charles M. Hicks, her husband, and Jack Hicks, her son, to make discovery, under oath, of the money and property alleged in the petition annexed thereto to be in their possession.
On the return day of the order, Kathryn T. Hicks, one of the respondents, filed an answer claiming title to a Rolls Royce automobile and to household furniture, etc., claimed to be wrongfully withheld by her. That proceeding was tried before one of the surrogates and resulted in a dismissal…
2Cited by32 opinions
- In re the Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Estate of LusherNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- Babcock v. BabcockNew York Supreme Court · 1933
- In re the Estate of O'FlynNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of CampbellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.