Legal Opinion
In re Goodchild
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided October 9, 1936PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
‘ Wingate, S.
The facts in this discovery proceeding are undisputed. On May 21, 1935, the infants, Theodore and Robert Goodchild, were respectively fifteen and eleven years of age, and had no legally appointed guardian. On some undisclosed previous date each had received as a legacy from a grandmother two $1,000 bonds of Atlanta Realty Corporation on Hurt Building, Atlanta, Ga. On February 26, 1932, these bonds had been deposited with the First National Bank of Atlanta, under an agreement dated on the fourth day of that month, the terms of which are not in evidence. The bank had issued two…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Knox v. Eden Musee Americain Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Weaver v. . BardenNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Howarth v. . AngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Wen Kroy Realty Co. v. Public National Bank & Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- In re the Estate of WeidbergNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- Buchman v. American Foam Rubber CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Career Placement of White Plains, Inc. v. VausNew York Supreme Court · 1974
- In re the Estate of FerraraNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Estate of HolquinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.