Legal Opinion

Westminster Investment Co. v. McCurtain

Utah Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1911No. 2217PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. 0. IF. Morse, Judge. Replevin by tbe Westminster Investment Company against' Drank McCurtain. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

Respondent, a corporation, brought this action in, claim and delivery to recover the possession of its automobile which it alleged appellant wrongfully detained.from it. The complaint is in the usual form in such cases. Appellant filed an answer wherein he admitted respondent’s corporate capacity, and that it was the owner of the automobile, and coupled therewith he added a general denial of all other allegatious contained in the complaint. He further answered, and, as an affirmative defense, he, in substance, averred that the respondent on a da,y named by him had delivered the automobile in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dillon Implement Co. v. CleavelandUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Utah Ass'n of Credit Men v. Home Fire InsuranceUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Brixen v. JorgensenUtah Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Baker v. Hatch, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1927
  2. State v. BartholomewUtah Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Howard v. J. P. Paulson Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Prows v. HawleyUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Battle Creek Bread Wrapping MacH. Co. v. Paramount Baking Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API